Americans in France 1919-1939 : The conditions of their entry and residence.
Nicole Fouché, CNRS (CRH/EHESS)
14 May 1999
Controls rather than entry restrictions
France reestablished the passport by the decree
of 3 August 1914. A visa was only required when Americans wanted
to leave France to travel elsewhere in Europe and then return to
France. They were also subject to French customs (heavy duties)
but without particular annoyances.
As of 2 April 1917, they were, like all foreigners, required to
have an ID card, but at the Prefecture of Police in Paris, a
special section was reserved for them, along with the English.
The social breakdown of those enteringmerchants,
professionals, manufacturers, financiers, intellectuals, skilled
tradesmen, artistsindicates that the Americans were mostly
in the category of non-salaried foreigners, which
spared them the mark associated with the ID for industrial or
agricultural workers (which implied an inferior status).
The Americans involved in commerce had to have a professional
ID. As of 1936, even American tourists (less and less numerous)
were also required to have a tourist card. To this day, I have
not encountered cases of exclusion, deportation or extradition of
Americans from France.
Freedom of enterprise
What interested the Americans were the careers and private
businesses of Frances tertiary sector that were based on
freedom of enterprisebanks, insurance companies, business
services, sales offices, import-export, tourism, transportation,
travel, press, health, teaching, art, education. In the tertiary
sector, Legislation concerning French citizens was almost
nonexistent, and that aimed at foreigners even more so. It was an
extremely open sector. Thus, the Americans were not subject to
control by French employers (they were not affected by the
restrictive laws of the 1930s) but by their own compatriots. The
American partners applied French laws on wages and
social-security benefits (work injury, 40-hour work week, paid
vacations etc.). American shopkeepers in France were required to
be listed in the trade register and pay the small-business
tax.
French ostracism and American responses
Americans were hardly bothered by the fact that
they could not become lawyers because the attorneys within the
American community in France had no desire to be admitted to the
French bar. They preferred their extraterritorial situation. What
was more troublesome, however, especially at the American
Hospital in Paris, was the fact that they could not recruit
American doctors (although, after years of negotiations, they
ultimately succeeded in obtaining the presence of at least six
American practitioners through the specific law of 18 May 1949).
Americans were excluded from the so-called prorogation
laws (legally maintaining tenants in their apartments)
which were intended to confront the housing crisis at the end of
the war. But via diplomatic channels, they obtained an
interpretive agreement which officially gave them the
same rights as French citizens.
American companies and individuals were taxed twice, in France
and in the United States. The Americans of France failed to get
this double taxation eliminated for individuals but succeeded in
improving the lot of companies through a bilateral agreement
between France and the United States stipulating exoneration
measures.
Seizing opportunities
Making little use of the right to the free, secular, required
education that they could have received; the Americans preferred
to give their children an American-style education in private,
tuition-paying schools (from primary to high school). After high
school, the young people often went to study in the United
States.
On the other hand, they fully benefited from the right of free
association established by the law of 1901 to set up numerous
private American associations in France. These were totally
autonomous because they were composed of American volunteers and
funded by the colony. They existed in all areasreligion,
health, mutual aid, leisure activities, culture, education,
trade, defense of the colonys interestsand they
permitted an American national identity to be maintained
abroad.
Conclusion
Little affected by the French desire to restrict immigration, the Americans always had the means to exert pressure by invoking diplomacyand reciprocity. Any measure going against their interests could be used against the interests of the French in the United States. In the case of the Americans, we can hardly speak of control of their flows, or their numbers, by the French authorities.